Komparasi Static Routing Menggunakan IPv4 Dengan IPv6 Guna Meningkatkan Quality Of Service

Authors

  • Tommi Alfian Armawan Sandi Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Rachmat Ad Purnama Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Firmansyah Firmansyah Universitas Nusa Mandiri
  • Sujiliani Heristian Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31294/coscience.v2i1.891

Keywords:

Routing, Static Routing, Troughput, Delay, Packeet Loss

Abstract

The use of technology has recently increased in line with the increase in devices connected to the internet. The IP capacity that covers the device is starting to get out of hand. Routing is needed when the local network is already complex, especially broadcast traffic is only concentrated in each subnet/network. When using IPv4 and IPv6, a routing protocol is required for data exchange or interconnection from client to client or client to server. IPv4 routing performance decreases as the size of the routing table increases, this is due to checking the MTU header on each router and hop switch. IPv6 with its routing process is much more efficient than its predecessor, and also has the ability to manage the large capacity of the route table, so in this study the authors compare IPv4 and IPv6 in terms of static routing efficiency on MikroTik routers.

References

Al-Fayyadh, F. K. (2018). Performance of Wireless Network IEEE 802.11 under Dual-Stack Environment. International Iraqi Conference on Engineering Technology and Its Applications, IICETA 2018, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/IICETA.2018.8458070

Ashraf, S. (2021). A proactive role of IoT devices in building smart cities. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 1(August), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2021.08.001

Ashraf, S., A. Arfeen, Z., A. Khan, M., & Ahmed, T. (2020). SLM-OJ: Surrogate Learning Mechanism during Outbreak Juncture. International Journal for Modern Trends in Science and Technology, 6(5), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.46501/ijmtst060525

Ashraf, S., Muhammad, D., & Aslam, Z. (2020). Analyzing challenging aspects of IPv6 over IPv4. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer Dan Informatika, 6(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.26555/jiteki.v16i1.17105

Ashraf, S., Raza, A., Aslam, Z., Naeem, H., & Ahmed, T. (2020). Underwater resurrection routing synergy using astucious energy pods. Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC), 1(5), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.1535

Huang, J. Y., & Wang, P. C. (2018). TCAM-Based IP Address Lookup Using Longest Suffix Split. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 26(2), 976–989. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2018.2815999

Liu, G., Quan, W., Cheng, N., Zhang, H., & Shen, X. (2020). VLI: Variable-Length Identifier for Interconnecting Heterogeneous IoT Networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 9(8), 1146–1149. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWC.2020.2982641

Pratama, A. M., & Djumena, E. (2020). Pengguna Internet Indonesia hingga Kuartal II 2020 Capai 196,7 Juta Orang. Kompas.Com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/11/09/213534626/pengguna-internet-indonesia-hingga-kuartal-ii-2020-capai-1967-juta-orang

Roddav, N., Streit, K., Rodosek, G. D., & Pras, A. (2019). On the Usage of DSCP and ECN codepoints in internet backbone traffic traces for IPv4 and IPv6. 2019 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications, ISNCC 2019, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISNCC.2019.8909187

Tantoni, A., Zaen, M. T. A., & Fadli, S. (2018). ANALISIS KOMPARASI PERFORMA JARINGAN KOMPUTER PADA IMPLEMENTASI IPv4 dan IPv6. Jurnal Informatika Dan Rekayasa Elektronik, 1(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.36595/jire.v1i2.60

Downloads

Published

2022-01-28